<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Zayne&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>My thoughts on things...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:35:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple now posting daily MobileMe updates, still doesn&#8217;t pack it up and relaunch it. by hoortirty</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/apple-now-posting-daily-mobileme-updates-still-doesnt-pack-it-up-and-relaunch-it/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>hoortirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=484#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,
My computer worked slowly, too much mistakes and buggs. Help me, please to fix buggs on my computer. 
I used Windows XP.
Thanks,
hoortirty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,<br />
My computer worked slowly, too much mistakes and buggs. Help me, please to fix buggs on my computer.<br />
I used Windows XP.<br />
Thanks,<br />
hoortirty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Radio Shack trying to design Apple-like stores? by toddliss</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/is-radio-shack-trying-to-design-apple-like-stores/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>toddliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=416#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Name changes are historically bad.  They should redesign their stores, but leave their name:

http://whowhatwherewheny.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/the-shack-bevmo-and-wamu-and-good-names-turned-bad/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Name changes are historically bad.  They should redesign their stores, but leave their name:</p>
<p><a href="http://whowhatwherewheny.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/the-shack-bevmo-and-wamu-and-good-names-turned-bad/" rel="nofollow">http://whowhatwherewheny.wordpress.com/2009/08/10/the-shack-bevmo-and-wamu-and-good-names-turned-bad/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Microsoft-Part 2: It&#8217;s a ad about nothing! by The Problem with Microsoft-Part 3: Managing some Broken Windows &#171; Zayne Humphrey&#8217;s Blog.</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2009/04/29/the-problem-with-microsoft-part-2/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>The Problem with Microsoft-Part 3: Managing some Broken Windows &#171; Zayne Humphrey&#8217;s Blog.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=862#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] at least I didn&#8217;t lie completely when I said last week that this part would come on Wednesday, though, it was supposed to be the Wednesday before this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least I didn&#8217;t lie completely when I said last week that this part would come on Wednesday, though, it was supposed to be the Wednesday before this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Microsoft-Part 1: A Tangled Mess. by The Problem with Microsoft-Part 2: It&#8217;s a ad about nothing! &#171; Zayne Humphrey&#8217;s Blog.</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2009/04/27/problem-with-microsoft-part-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>The Problem with Microsoft-Part 2: It&#8217;s a ad about nothing! &#171; Zayne Humphrey&#8217;s Blog.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=852#comment-234</guid>
		<description>[...] Problem With Microsoft&#8221;.  Sorry about it being a series.  The first part can be found here, and don&#8217;t worry, like yesterday&#8217;s part, this part is going to be more of a suggestion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Problem With Microsoft&#8221;.  Sorry about it being a series.  The first part can be found here, and don&#8217;t worry, like yesterday&#8217;s part, this part is going to be more of a suggestion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is that a iPhone Nano in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me? by Bookmarks about Nano</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/is-that-a-iphone-nano-in-your-pocket-or-are-you-just-happy-to-see-me/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Nano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=523#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 3 members originally found by pri22059410 on 2008-12-01  Is that a iPhone Nano in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 3 members originally found by pri22059410 on 2008-12-01  Is that a iPhone Nano in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Verizon claims they need freedom to delay p2p traffic. Yeah, no. by BroadDev - Unified Communications, Virtualization, Security, and Web 2.0 &#187; Verizon on VoIP and P2P</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/09/10/verizon-claims-they-need-freedom-to-delay-p2p-traffic-yeah-no/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>BroadDev - Unified Communications, Virtualization, Security, and Web 2.0 &#187; Verizon on VoIP and P2P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=635#comment-210</guid>
		<description>[...] at ZAYNE HUMPHREY’S BLOG he posts that Verizon is saying that they need the freedom to delay p2p packets in favor of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at ZAYNE HUMPHREY’S BLOG he posts that Verizon is saying that they need the freedom to delay p2p packets in favor of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why the &#8220;stand against child porn&#8221;, isn&#8217;t really a stand against it. by isp list</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/why-the-stand-against-child-porn-isnt-really-a-stand-against-it/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>isp list</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=421#comment-163</guid>
		<description>[...] child porn, a bunch of cable providers under the umbrella of the NCTA have announced an agreehttp://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/why-the-stand-against-child-porn-isnt-really-a-stand-a...Read &quot;What newsgroups does YOUR isp provide you? let&#039;s compare &amp; ask our OWN for more?&quot; at Home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] child porn, a bunch of cable providers under the umbrella of the NCTA have announced an agreehttp://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/why-the-stand-against-child-porn-isnt-really-a-stand-a&#8230;Read &#8220;What newsgroups does YOUR isp provide you? let&#8217;s compare &#38; ask our OWN for more?&#8221; at Home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac OS X 10.5.3 arrives, with a little friend with him too. by itunes support link artwork</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/mac-os-x-1053-arrives-with-a-little-friend-with-him-too/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>itunes support link artwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=193#comment-162</guid>
		<description>[...] system improvements that enhance the stability, compatibility, and security of your Mac. For dehttp://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/mac-os-x-1053-arrives-with-a-little-friend-with-him-to...iTunes 7 turning out to have major glitches - EngadgetWhen we were deep inside Maestro Jobs&#039; reality [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] system improvements that enhance the stability, compatibility, and security of your Mac. For dehttp://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/mac-os-x-1053-arrives-with-a-little-friend-with-him-to&#8230;iTunes 7 turning out to have major glitches &#8211; EngadgetWhen we were deep inside Maestro Jobs&#8217; reality [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Time Warner to start metering test in Texas. Texas, please fight it off. by lethologica</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/06/04/time-warner-to-start-metering-test-in-texas-texas-please-fight-it-off/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>lethologica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=205#comment-147</guid>
		<description>I’ve recently taken up net neutrality as somewhat of a flagship issue after reading this story about Time Warner and now Comcast rolling out what I consider to be extremely net neutrality-hostile policies. Comcast is instituting “protocol agnostic” bandwidth management policies (note that they are not called “content agnostic”). Now neither of these may be directly related to the issue of net neutrality in the sense that they do not appear on their face to give one content provider a notable advantage over another.

In both cases, however, there is ample room for abuse if we do not push Congress to enact regulations and oversight that prevents the telcos from abandoning their obligation to remain “common carriers”. I have tried to make the case throughout the blogosphere that absent any net neutrality regulation, metering and bandwidth caps will be the trojan horse through which they introduce the “slow lane” that goes to the heart of this issue.

If metered usage does end up becoming prevalent, people will absolutely hate it before too long (and most of us will have no other options). Without net neutrality, I believe that we will see the telcos introduce “preferred partner” content that will not be subject to these meters and caps. The consumers will have absolutely no say in which sites get this preferential treatment, but I can guarantee you that it will benefit the telocs more than the public at large.

Comcast and TWC will never outright prohibit users from going to any site they want, but any sort of preferential treatment such as the type I’ve described above is totally fair game without a rock solid set of laws protecting net neutrality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve recently taken up net neutrality as somewhat of a flagship issue after reading this story about Time Warner and now Comcast rolling out what I consider to be extremely net neutrality-hostile policies. Comcast is instituting “protocol agnostic” bandwidth management policies (note that they are not called “content agnostic”). Now neither of these may be directly related to the issue of net neutrality in the sense that they do not appear on their face to give one content provider a notable advantage over another.</p>
<p>In both cases, however, there is ample room for abuse if we do not push Congress to enact regulations and oversight that prevents the telcos from abandoning their obligation to remain “common carriers”. I have tried to make the case throughout the blogosphere that absent any net neutrality regulation, metering and bandwidth caps will be the trojan horse through which they introduce the “slow lane” that goes to the heart of this issue.</p>
<p>If metered usage does end up becoming prevalent, people will absolutely hate it before too long (and most of us will have no other options). Without net neutrality, I believe that we will see the telcos introduce “preferred partner” content that will not be subject to these meters and caps. The consumers will have absolutely no say in which sites get this preferential treatment, but I can guarantee you that it will benefit the telocs more than the public at large.</p>
<p>Comcast and TWC will never outright prohibit users from going to any site they want, but any sort of preferential treatment such as the type I’ve described above is totally fair game without a rock solid set of laws protecting net neutrality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gates and DEVELOPER-Man to show some of Windows 7 at D6. by Zayne Humphrey</title>
		<link>http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/gates-and-developer-man-to-show-some-of-windows-7-at-d6/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Zayne Humphrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zaynehumphrey.wordpress.com/?p=191#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, Microsoft does have knowledge that Vista sucks, but so far, Windows 7 just looks like Vista with touch-capabilities. I&#039;m hoping Windows 7 is nearly, or actually a try to write Windows from the top up. Vista was supposed to wow us, when it only makes us say yawn, while in 2004, Longhorn made me, a usual Windows/Microsoft hater, actually look forward to a Windows Release that wasn&#039;t 95/98.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, Microsoft does have knowledge that Vista sucks, but so far, Windows 7 just looks like Vista with touch-capabilities. I&#8217;m hoping Windows 7 is nearly, or actually a try to write Windows from the top up. Vista was supposed to wow us, when it only makes us say yawn, while in 2004, Longhorn made me, a usual Windows/Microsoft hater, actually look forward to a Windows Release that wasn&#8217;t 95/98.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
